A local-first platform that unifies enterprise knowledge scattered across issue trackers, wikis, code hosts, and QA assets — then surfaces the conflicts between them and helps a human decide, with an audit trail. Read-only by design: every connector structurally refuses to write. A daily build journal.
Some days you ship code. Some days you ship clarity. An audit found six unused dependencies, four frameworks in the docs that the code never imported, and nine capabilities in the pitch deck that lived in no backlog. Today produced no features. It produced a project that knows what it is.
Read more →It started as "how do we ingest our wiki?" and ended as a generic, reusable connector. The unit tests passed against a fake server. Then I ran it against a real one, and reality had notes — a Windows subprocess bug and a reference server that didn't implement the primitive I'd assumed.
Read more →The platform went from "it surfaces problems" to "it helps you decide and produce" — and ended with a bug it had already warned me about. In a document it wrote. About itself. I should read my own generated docs.
Read more →A long UX sweep driven entirely by someone poking at the app and asking the questions a real user asks. A wall of 2,773 near-identical rule cards became a navigable tree. The value isn't the feature — it's making the feature legible.
Read more →Where it started. Retrieval-augmented generation over enterprise documents, designed to run disconnected. The architecture, the retrieval strategy, and the honest trade-offs.
Read more →